<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the Game: U-G-L-Y</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netsarescorching.com/2009/11/03/thoughts-on-the-game-u-g-l-y/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netsarescorching.com/2009/11/03/thoughts-on-the-game-u-g-l-y/</link>
	<description>NetsAreScorching is a NBA blog that follows the New Jersey Nets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:19:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Manuel</title>
		<link>http://netsarescorching.com/2009/11/03/thoughts-on-the-game-u-g-l-y/comment-page-1/#comment-3263</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netsarescorching.com/?p=3988#comment-3263</guid>
		<description>while i was going crazy watching that horrible game all i could think about late was why isnt Najera getting a chance the Nets only had 10 available players why would u leave a guy on the bench for the whole game. if simmons were maybe havinga good game shooting wise then keep him in but he wasnt doing anything. after the game Frank says that he kept simmons in the game cause he was doing a good job of &quot;rebounding&quot; the ball he only had six boards and gerald wallace was still getting a ton of offensive boards. simmons played 24 mins with no points on 0 of 5 from the field thats a joke. and come on when they didnt score for 10 mins they had absolutely no energy everyone had there head down in disgrace and started forcing bad passes and bad shots that would have been a good time to put Najera in the game all he does is play with maximum energy and lots of heart im shore he could have given us some sort of spark. and i think najera is the better rebounder so when frank said that after the game i thought that was bull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while i was going crazy watching that horrible game all i could think about late was why isnt Najera getting a chance the Nets only had 10 available players why would u leave a guy on the bench for the whole game. if simmons were maybe havinga good game shooting wise then keep him in but he wasnt doing anything. after the game Frank says that he kept simmons in the game cause he was doing a good job of &#8220;rebounding&#8221; the ball he only had six boards and gerald wallace was still getting a ton of offensive boards. simmons played 24 mins with no points on 0 of 5 from the field thats a joke. and come on when they didnt score for 10 mins they had absolutely no energy everyone had there head down in disgrace and started forcing bad passes and bad shots that would have been a good time to put Najera in the game all he does is play with maximum energy and lots of heart im shore he could have given us some sort of spark. and i think najera is the better rebounder so when frank said that after the game i thought that was bull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djheavyduty</title>
		<link>http://netsarescorching.com/2009/11/03/thoughts-on-the-game-u-g-l-y/comment-page-1/#comment-3257</link>
		<dc:creator>djheavyduty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netsarescorching.com/?p=3988#comment-3257</guid>
		<description>I agree with your first sentence but I&#039;m not being sarcastic
The Nets played zone D for the first time in the first half of last nights game. 
The Nets actually looked good playing zone. 
Its a lot easier to guard a spot on the fioor than a person dribbling.
Brook needs a real coach or a coach that knows how to use a post player.
Brook is reciving the ball too low, his man is jumping the pass and stealing it.
 The ball needs to go into the post and passed out if brook doesn&#039;t have the shot, but then brook has to have the chance to reset even if the ball gets rotated around the court and brook or Yi sets up for a post move.

Brook is dribbling to much. 2 dribbles, a move, and a couunter or take it to the basket.
He has great offensive skills, a soft touch and good range.
Brook is getting in foul trouble because of bad perimeter D
Brook is also swatting down on. Shots, he has to keep his hands high on D or he&#039;s gonna get the whistle.
The injuries are 1 thing.
Bad D is a direct affect from coaching
Bad O is players being selfish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your first sentence but I&#8217;m not being sarcastic<br />
The Nets played zone D for the first time in the first half of last nights game.<br />
The Nets actually looked good playing zone.<br />
Its a lot easier to guard a spot on the fioor than a person dribbling.<br />
Brook needs a real coach or a coach that knows how to use a post player.<br />
Brook is reciving the ball too low, his man is jumping the pass and stealing it.<br />
 The ball needs to go into the post and passed out if brook doesn&#8217;t have the shot, but then brook has to have the chance to reset even if the ball gets rotated around the court and brook or Yi sets up for a post move.</p>
<p>Brook is dribbling to much. 2 dribbles, a move, and a couunter or take it to the basket.<br />
He has great offensive skills, a soft touch and good range.<br />
Brook is getting in foul trouble because of bad perimeter D<br />
Brook is also swatting down on. Shots, he has to keep his hands high on D or he&#8217;s gonna get the whistle.<br />
The injuries are 1 thing.<br />
Bad D is a direct affect from coaching<br />
Bad O is players being selfish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
