Home > Uncategorized > Why John Wall is the #1 Pick

Why John Wall is the #1 Pick

So as my introductory piece, I’d like to do a re-post. Some of you have likely already seen this on the popular SBNation subsidiary NetsDaily – I originally posted it under my NetsDaily username Newark2Brooklyn. It elicited a fair amount of discussion once it was put on their front page. I wrote this before Thorn said he’d take Wall with the first pick, and it was partly a response to the Wall-Turner debate that was going on there. Some people agreed with my assessment completely, others were the exact opposite. I usually consider that a good sign.

Glad to be writing for NetsAreScorching, and rest assured, mostly everything else I write will be less than half this length.

As far as the future goes, only two things are for certain: a) the Nets will have a top four pick in the draft this coming summer, and b) a lot of cap space. Everything else is in flux. No one (save Brook Lopez and Mikhail Prokhorov) is untouchable. Because the Nets have the best chance of getting the #1 pick (25% to be exact), one of the more exciting topics that Nets fans have is centered around who the Nets should take if they end up getting it. There are two obvious candidates – Kentucky freshman point guard John Wall, or Ohio State junior swingman Evan Turner.

Hartford_v_kentucky_out5hmbid4sl_medium

Evan Turner is an awesome basketball player. John Wall is the #1 pick.


This is probably a little premature as a Nets fan – after all, we only have a 25% chance of the first pick – but this analysis could apply to nearly any team who would pick number one. I’m only going over who is the best prospect. I originally was on the Turner bandwagon, and switched back and forth a few times throughout the season. The original title for this post was “John Wall or Evan Turner?” until I realized that my argument was going decidedly in one direction.

That being said, don’t get me wrong. Evan Turner is an excellent basketball player and will continue to be at the next level. He’s a great rebounder for a swing man, has an excellent midrange and slashing game, is a willing defender, runs the floor like a gazelle, and can carry a team (as proven with Ohio State). He’s as close to a future star at the NBA level as you can get. Unless, of course, your name is John Wall. & For the next two thousand-plus words, I’m going to tell you why.


Ten_tournament_championship_game_nptv6i1wlpjl_medium Sec_basketball_tournament_quarterfinals_v1z1wy1m_wcl_medium

The two best prospects in the NCAA. The future of professional basketball.


1) John Wall is the single best athletic specimen the league has seen since Dwight Howard or LeBron James. Yes, everyone talks about this. Yes, it’s boring and repetitive to mention. There’s a reason people mention it. Because it’s freaking true. Chad Ford calls him extraterrestrially athletic. Jonathon Givony merely calls it freakish. Whatever you call it, it’s there, and barring a catastrophe of Len Bias proportions, it ain’t leaving. We all thought Derrick Rose was an athletic gift from God, and one year later the basketball deities bless us with someone who arguably blows him out of the water. Evan Turner is a solid athlete – he’s got an NBA-ready body, takes extremely long strides and has great size for the SG position – but he’s nowhere near the athlete that John Wall is. In today’s continually evolving NBA game, athletic ability means more and more every year.

Words can’t describe how awesome this dunk was. Hopefully video can. (Or slow-motion video, too.)


No matter how you judge athleticism, Wall isn’t just off the charts – he’s past the moon. Leaping ability? The guy’s listed at 6’4″* and can dunk with two hands off an unguarded step. Lateral quickness? The guy can stay in front of anyone on defense, and even if he gets beat going in one direction is still able to recover and stay in front of his man. Although Kemba Walker actually makes this shot, you see an example of this here. End-to-end speed? There are about a hundred videos on YouTube showcasing that, so I figure one that also shows his change-of-direction speed (and leaping ability, for that matter) would be a better choice – many of you have probably seen this one before. Physical tools? He can finish with either hand, is chiseled, and has arms that stretch further than any point guard in the NCAA. Seriously. He’s got to have at least a 6’9″ wingspan. (Note: Wall’s wingspan, as measured at the combine, is 6’9.25″. Evan Turner’s wingspan? 6’8″. Told you.) Next time you see him play, watch how far his arms extend on defense. Or don’t, just look at the picture below. I think it provoked a lot of those early Dwyane Wade (who has a 6’11 wingspan) comparisons, when people were still figuring out whether or not he was a point guard.

I want to say something clever about how long his arms are, but doesn’t this just speak for itself?


Luckily, that leads into my second point, which is:

2) John Wall’s feel for the point guard position is sublime for someone with his pedigree and ability to score. Let’s step back for a second. This is a guy who dominated high school basketball as an individual. He came to Lexington knowing he was likely the #1 pick in the NBA draft on potential unless he snoozed away his entire season. He could have spent most of his time jacking up shots and playing up his star status. Instead, here’s a guy who’s fourth in the NCAA in assists per 40 (pace adjusted). The guy averages a tick under 13 shots per 40PA – far from chucker level. Unless the game is on the line, you don’t see him forcing the issue. When Wall brings the ball up the court, there’s no worry about whether or not the point guard’s going to go into 1-on-5 mode (unless he’s really got a lane, and in that case, who would stop him? Not John Calipari, not his teammates, and definitely not Rider). He’s more Rajon Rondo than Allen Iverson. He’s shown an ability to be coachable (minor spat with Calipari aside) and understands that working within a team system doesn’t confine his talent, it explores it.

Beautiful drive and dish. Just like mom used to make.


Speaking of coachable…

3) John Calipari is known for developing point guards in college that excel in the NBA. Derrick Rose, Tyreke Evans. Calipari is kind of a sleazeball so that’s all I’ll say before this article gets removed from the record books.

4) John Wall’s college statistics are excellent for a point guard. One of the major arguments for Evan Turner in the “who should go #1″ discussion is that his college stats blow Wall’s out of the water – and, to an extent, that’s a very valid point. Evan Turner is putting up raw figures that dominate any and all competition in the NCAA. The man is a legitimate triple-double threat every single night – 20 points, nine and a half rebounds and six assists per game are absolutely monstrous numbers. We haven’t seen anything like it since Larry Bird. The fact that he only turned it up in the Big Ten Tournament is an excellent indicator as well.

The issue with this argument, however, is that great point guards in the NBA often do not dominate statistically at the NCAA level.  Wing players like Adam Morrison** are a dime a dozen in the pros, yet if you looked solely at his raw statistics at Gonzaga you’d convince yourself that he was the next Bird.*** Empirically, Wall can’t compete because the college game doesn’t reward great point guards with adequate statistical representation.

For example, let’s look  at some great point guards drafted in the last decade and their raw numbers in college.

Chris Paul – 15 ppg, 6.3 apg, 4.5 rpg, 47.2 FG%, 2.5 spg in 33.5 mpg over two basically identical years

Deron Williams – 11 ppg, 5.9 apg, 3.3 rpg, 42.2 FG%, 1.1 spg in 31.7 mpg over one “rookie year” and two years of about 13pts/6ast in 33-34 minutes

Rajon Rondo – 9.6 ppg, 4.2 apg, 4.5 rpg, 49.3 FG%, 2.3 spg in 28.1 mpg over two seasons (little better his second year, although is percentages went down)

Derrick Rose – 14.9 ppg, 4.7 apg, 4.5 rpg, 47.7 FG%, 1.2 spg in 29.2 mpg in one year

Devin Harris – 14.8 ppg, 3.1 apg, 4.1 rpg, 44.7 FG%, 1.7 spg in 35 mpg over two decent years and a breakout junior season

Tyreke Evans – 17.1 ppg, 3.9 apg, 5.4 rpg, 45.5 FG%, 2.1 spg in 29 mpg in one year

And,

John Wall – 16.6 ppg, 6.5 apg, 4.3 rpg, 46.1 FG%, 1.8 spg in 34.8 mpg in one year.

Wall posts the second-highest scoring average, the most assists, near the bottom in rebounds (0.2 behind three guys), and middle-of-the-pack in field goal percentage and steals, while taking on a much higher load minutes-wise and reliance-wise than any other player (although, to be fair, none of these guys had a college big like DeMarcus Cousins to defer to). These numbers aren’t contextualized at all, though, so let’s look at per-40 pace adjusted stats from each player’s freshman year.

It’s a little small, so click & view the image itself to see the full-sized chart. Wall scores at the third-highest rate (behind Rose and Evans – the other two Calipari products), dishes out the most assists, turns the ball over a lot (turnover numbers basically increase as the years progress), commits the fewest fouls, and otherwise falls in the middle/top half of the pack. Note also that his rebounding totals look much better when contextualized in this manner. While there’s more context to be found here – the systems each team ran, for example, are very different outside of the Calipari 3 – it’s safe to say that between the change in hand-checking rules, the NBA’s defensive three seconds rule, quicker possessions at the NBA level, and much wider spacing, star point guards at the collegiate level find stats much easier to attain in the pros than in the amateurs, and a guy with Wall’s combination of basketball IQ and athleticism is the prototypical point guard to dominate because of these changes.

Now, of course, this goes both ways. Mike Conley had somewhat decent stats in college and has hit a wall in the NBA. Raymond Felton similarly looked pretty solid at UNC. This is where you really have to look a little past the numbers; Felton was a short point guard on a stacked college team, Conley wasn’t nearly as assertive on either end of the floor & and while impressive athletically didn’t have nearly the athletic potential that Wall exhibits on a nightly basis.

John_wall_medium

Midair body control. Nobody beats the Wall. (Dick Vitale agrees.)


5) John Wall’s blend of basketball ability and athletic ability is unmatched at the amateur level. For me, this really comes down to his ability to absorb contact and finish in traffic. His body control – evidenced by shots such as the one above that reminded Dick why he loves March Madness, and this ridiculous shot against Tennessee – is unbelievable for a point guard. Hell, for any position.

Just as important as anything else, though, is his sublime sense of the moment. We all heard the stories of how he hit clutch shot after clutch shot to start the season, but that underscores his true ability to rise to the occasion. Let me show you an example. The Louisville-Kentucky game – “The Bloodbath” – was a game where tensions ran high throughout. The first substitution happened seven seconds in, when Eric Bledsoe was replaced after arguing an early foul call. There were six fouls and three technicals assessed before there was a single shot attempt by either team. (Seriously.) DeMarcus Cousins was hit in the crotch and retaliated by elbowing the assailant in the face. It was not exactly what you’d call a graceful affair. Kentucky & Louisville both smelled blood, and they wanted a taste. With 9 and a half minutes to go in the second half, the score read 42-41 Louisville, and that’s when John Wall took over.

He starts off the show with a pump fake, getting his man (Louisville guard Edgar Sosa) off of his feet and flying past him. He drives to the hoop, hangs in midair for a seemingly impossible amount of time, gets off a shot at a ridiculous angle with two help defenders in his face, and somehow banks it in. 43-42 Kentucky. After Sosa turns the ball over on the next play, Wall receives a pass in the corner, evades Jerry Smith playing in the Louisville zone, and pulls up on the run from 17 feet. Swish. 45-42 Kentucky. Wall, feeling the momentum, picks Pedro Silva’s pocket on the next defensive play, leading to a near behind-the-back layup from Wall (the one that’s become his trademark) stopped only by a hard foul. Wall coolly hits the two free throws, puts Kentucky up 47-42, and Louisville never really threatened again.

Louisville_v_kentucky_qryizl5ejm1l_medium

“I talked about his poise and his presence, Verne. You’re seeing his presence now.” – Clark Kellogg


When it comes down to it, there aren’t any prospects that match Wall’s combination of athletic ability, basketball smarts, feel for position, sense of the moment, & potential. Evan Turner comes closest, and he’s still more of a question mark. Will he be as effective in a system not built around him? We point to his unbelievable stats (and he deserves credit for them), but he also plays on a team with no real point guard and nobody who can rebound. As the unquestioned alpha dog and a pretty good rebounder/passer already, it’s no surprise that he focuses on getting them. Getting 10 rebounds a game as a wing is pretty remarkable – okay, it’s flat-out incredible – but had Jared Sullinger (the best rebounder in this year’s high school class & a future Buckeye) joined Ohio State this year instead of last year I think you’d see a downtick in those raw numbers.

All in all, I know I’ll get some argument because a fair amount of people here love Turner (and even Cousins), regardless of what or how much I write. That being said, I see Turner as a future star in the mold of a lower-middle-class man’s Brandon Roy or Scottie Pippen. He’ll sill be a great player and he’s worthy of the #2 pick in this draft. But John Wall combines the best aspects of Rajon Rondo with Kevin Johnson and Derrick Rose. He really has no equal. The hype is not undeserved, the praise not unwarranted. He really is just that good.

Both sides of the floor with the game on the line.


For me, there’s really one comparison that lines up cleanly with these two guys. When I was fourteen, there were two players that were being strongly considered for the #1 pick. Both big guys. The first guy was a high school kid, lauded as a hyperactive, jump-out-of-the-arena freak. He was described as “athletic and fluid” by NBA.com. Chad Ford of ESPN.com said he had “the most upside in the draft” and a “great attitude.” The other player, a three-year collegiate, had just come off a monster season – 16 points on 60% shooting on one of the best teams in the NCAA, 11 boards a game, a “physical specimen” and “aggressive rebounder” who played intelligent basketball with a tough work ethic.

I had convinced myself that the collegiate was the definite pick to make. It was obvious to me – you pick the proven beast. So when I found out that the Orlando Magic had selected – you guessed it – Dwight Howard over Emeka Okafor****, I thought the Magic had made the biggest mistake of their young franchise. I reamed it as much as a fourteen-year-old could. My dad got sick of me talking about it, and he’s my dad. I even became a Bobcats fan and played as them on NBA Live just to make sure Okafor would always have a higher rating. (It’s okay. I’ve since switched to 2K.)

But, of course, Howard became the all-world player, the top center in the league and the best player on a legitimate championship contender. Okafor, while a serviceable center, has never really capitalized on that talent, becoming a legitimate, consistent double-double threat but never a game-changer like Howard.

So I was wrong.

Very wrong.

And I won’t be making that mistake again.

__________________________________________________________________________

asterisk (*) notes

*-I wouldn’t be surprised if come combine day Wall actually lists an inch or two shorter. Just a hunch, though.

**-I want to make clear that I am in NO WAY SAYING that Turner is going to end up like Adam Morrison. At all. He’s got one thousand times the talent that Morrison has ever had. I think he’s going to be a legitimately great NBA player. Just that stats at the collegiate level can be easily misinterpreted if not adjusting for context.

***-Unfortunately, so did part-owner, part-pseudo-GM Michael Jordan, and he inexplicably picked Morrison third – the pick MJ himself was selected with 22 years earlier. I was sixteen and I knew this was an awful idea, but once you’ve drafted Kwame Brown first overall, you’re weirdly bulletproof – no bust is gonna top that. Weird thing is, Morrison got a ring earlier in his career than Michael did. You can’t make this stuff up.

****-The comparison between Okafor and Turner is seriously weird. Two guys, both juniors in college, both great scorers and rebounders at their position, both winning outstanding player awards in their junior year (Turner for the season, Okafor for the tournament), & both likely #2 picks behind guys whose wingspans, length and upside could put Jay Bilas in an adjective coma. But the crazy part? Both suffered back fractures in their junior years. Yup. Talk about a verifiable WTF. Now don’t get me wrong, I’ll take any odds (ANY!) that Turner is going to have a more successful career than Okafor, who’s been plagued his whole career with bad ankles and good buffets. But it is something to think about.

When I kept the links with the pictures, it screwed up the way they looked. Photo & other credits:

Pictures 1-6, 8 thanks to zimbio.com. Absolutely awesome site for basketball photos (and photos in general). Picture 7 thanks to courierpress.com. Picture 9 thanks to ukbigbluenation.com. All collegiate stats from draftexpress.com, the single best NBA draft website on the net.

Categories: Uncategorized
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Why would we trade Devin Harris?
These stats are from 08-09, when he was healthy, as was CP3.

Of the 3 PGs who averaged over 20 pts/g, Devin Harris took the least amount of shots,about 400 less than Parker and 250 less than CP3.

He is 9th in assists.

He has great chemistry with Brook Lopez. He can slide to shooting guard to play with a point forward like Terrence or Turner.

And whoever said Turner is not as good as Terrence, Turner had better stats in college than Terrence did. He shoots 50% from the floor, which is amazing for a swingman. He isn't a thunderous dunker, but he is smart, taller, and a better player.

People are very high on Wall because of his great athletic ability and long wing span and his star "smile and looks" plus he is a terrific young player. Turner might be the better basketball player right now but that does not seem to count for much among the legions of Wall supporters. I would be very happy with either Wall, Cousins or Turner. Frankly I'm not that impressed with Wall, from the little I've seen of UK this year, but all these experts and pundits can't be wrong about his future superstar status in the NBA... or can they? Anybody who gets the #1 pick will draft Wall because of his "potential" and because of all the hype surrounding him. Nobody would dare not draft him #1. That is why some Nets fans are hoping the Nets don't get the #1 draft pick. I know how they feel but you still have to get the #1 pick and let Nets management decide who they want to take with the #1, even if it's not the player you would want. I would draft Cousins, Wall and Turner in that order but if you want to be slick and like to gamble, you could draft Wall #1 and then trade him down to get Cousins and pick up something extra from the team that gets Wall. Lets get the #1 pick first, then whatever happens will happen because we made it happen. Lets go Nets. Less the 6 days to go.

What the? There is no way that John Wall blows Derrick Rose out of the water in terms of athleticsm. And it's probably the other way around. They're both explosive, fast, and they both have hops but Drose is built like a tank. The hype over Wall is unbelievable. Have you seen all of Drose's athletic lay-ins in the paint and all his spectacular finishes at the rim? In no way have I seen John Wall able to adjust and just hang in the hair to get his shot off. Drose's finishing capabilities are unrivaled only to Lebron and Dwade.

theuuord...it's ManRam.

Great piece. Congrats on the new gig. I'll be sure to keep checking this out. Hope all is well.

Good luck at the draft Nets fans!

I left A.I. for my list because I don't think he is/was in the same class as Duncan, Shaq, LeBron and Howard. Spectacular one on one player, but I wouldn't want him on my team then or now. Even if I included A.I. on my list that would be only 5 players at in the last 20 + years picked #1, who turned out to be superstars. 25%... My point being, that the #1 is no guarantee of super stardom. Hopefully whoever we get is a very good player and fits into our team structure. Teams win championships not individual players.

Shanghi
my main point is
Not many teams will give the Nets what they want for DH.
The NBA is full of fast young PGs.
Even CP3 is expendable right now.
So how will the Nets get equal value for DH?
Portland is not giving up aldridge. No way No how.
Sorry you don't like the Odom deal but he is the best best PF off the bench in the league. If the Nets get DLee or some of big name PF Odom would have no problem being on the bench.

Iverson's not on your great list, come on now Mike...

I don't like Cousins, we don't need another headcase and I'm tired of this team getting screwed by them.

Thank God you're not the GM DJHeavyDuty, cuz i might actually have to kill you if you brought Odom to NJ for DH and Yi...silliest proposal ever.
I dunno if Evan Turner is better than 'Jedi Will', that's TBD. I'd rather have Williams' point skills.
And Chris, I live in Oregon and have Blazers as a second team. Trust me, LaMarcus would indeed be an upgrade over Yi, but he DOES NOT REBOUND at all....He is so frustrating because all he does is take jump shots and hooks, only a marginal upgrade over Yi and at a ridiculous price (if Portland even were to trade him, LA is near untouchable)

Another team I think the Nets should look to if they get Wall and decide to trade Harris is Portland. Andre Miller is nearing the end of his career, and Harris would be a nice second option behind Roy. If the Nets could work a deal for PF Lamarcus Aldridge that would be great. Maybe Harris, Yi, and pick #27 in this years draft for Lamarcus Aldridge. Aldridge is a big PF who can score and rebound, not to mention he is only 24. Blazers would get Yi to replace Aldridge, and they could try to figure him out and help him reach his potential. If the Nets then went and signed Rudy Gay, this would be their starting 5 and their ages going into next season:

PG Wall(20)
SG Lee(24) or Williams(23)
SF Gay(24)
PF Aldridge(25)
C Lopez(22)

This lineup could be great in a few years. Not only that, but they would have a good amount of cap space still to put together a strong bench with a few veterans.

John Wall is certainly athletically gifted, but I would not say he is to the level of Derrick Rose. He is fast and quick (as an above commentator said, there is a difference) like Rose, and he can jump out of the gym like Rose, but he is not strong like Rose. That is to say, he is chiseled, but Rose has the sort of husky build you normally don't see in a PG (let alone an explosively fast one). I don't think he'll be able to finish in the lane at the next level to the extent Rose already can, and he doesn't have a Chauncey Billups-type post game potential that Rose has either.

That said, he likely has better natural court vision than Rose (though his assist totals do benefit from a better supporting cast, as you mentioned). My biggest fear with Wall is the work ethic: Rose is a worker. In 2 years in the league, he has turned his jumper from a liability to a weapon, and his 3-point game is beginning to develop. I'm not sure that John Wall has that will to get better. And his jump shooting is just as shaky as Rose's was.

And frankly, when you are talented and gifted at the level Wall is, the will to work is what matters most. Look at Kobe Bryant, or the change that came over LeBron's game post-Olympics. Or like at how Beasley turned out for that matter. In college, a very talented player can excel without pushing himself to the limit. But in the NBA, no one (certainly no guard) can get away with this, no matter how talented.

Evan Turner is a better version of Terrence Williams. His ceiling is a poor man's LeBron.

I like how you compare Wall to all those other PG's in college and show that stats are not everything, which is true.

The key thing you left out is that Wall was playing with the premier post player in all of college basketball, and 4 other Top 15 picks.

How is doing a 2 handed dunk with 1 step impressive? I am the same height as Wall and I have never played a day of competitive basketball in my life, and I can get my elbow inside the rim with one step.

Don't get me started on Cousins. His attitude is a problem. He is like Zach Randolph. Given time, he could turn it around, but not anytime soon.

Like nijares said, this guy was convicted of breaking and entering back in May 2009, and was suspended for the first game of his only college year. Also, he spent 5 years in high school.

Wall has never faced adversity on the basketball court. Evan Turner broke his back and came back in half the time was expected.

Devin, Evan, Terrence, Boozer, Brook.

That is what I want to see next year.

Hey toast
What players would those teams give up that the Nets want?
Jamison, Varjao - clev
Odom LA
Murphy - Ind
Most of the teams that have what the Nets want already have a PG. The NBA is full of small fast guards. PFs are in demand.
I would like to see DH and Yi for Odom or TMurphy.

"What team needs a young fast PG?"

The Lakers, Pacers, Knicks, Cavs, Heat, and Hawks come to mind.

Let's talk about turnovers, baby... Wall isn't close to Rondo and Paul.

Wall had a 7.2 win score/40. Players in that neighborhood the year before getting drafted include Chris Quinn and Aaron Brooks. Not exactly a murderer's row...

The top players over the last decade in Win Score/40 who qualified at PG include (no mid-majors): Ty Lawson, Stephen Curry, Dwyane Wade, Brandon Roy, and Jameer Nelson.

That's a murderer's row of awesome.

According to WS/40, Reggie Williams was by far the best college SG of the last decade-- he just got a raw deal in the draft since he went to VMI. It's no surprise he started lighting it up with the Warriors the second he got a shot in the league.

I don't like using advanced metrics with college because it is such a different game compared to the pros. Plus, Wall didn't have to do everything on his team (he played with 4 other possible lottery picks). Look at the guys you mentioned, outside of Lawson they were the only options there which is why they had such high win scores...

Cousins I believe is overrated (and attitude is toxic).

As for Howard/Okafor, except for the rare freaks(Garnett/James/Bryant/Howard),I tend to trust more in the experienced, high IQ players, rather than upside as upside often never pans out.

As for Wall's B+E, he's a changed man (hopefully) and that was a rough patch in his life. You know his life story at that point? Not sure you wouldn't be doing the same thing.

Welcome Devin.
Wall is definetly the #1 pick. Evan a close #2.
I would take Wall over DH if I was stuck in a foxhole. DH has proved to be a diva and not the leader he should be. Wall willingly became the leader at Kentucky. Which is why DHarris will have to be moved.
But where? What team needs a young fast PG?
What if the Nets pick #3 or 4?
Did you see Calipari with Lebrons agent?
Where would TWill fit in the Nets backcourt logjam?
Next to the back to back finals run this the most exciting time to be a Nets fan are we just getting set up for a big let down?

You know i read this whole thing and before i did i REALLY wanted Turner for the Nets. Now i want WALL. But what are we going to do with HARRIS if we do get wall. #1 pick is obviously WALL so what about if we get 2,3, or 4. I think that if we dont get WALL or TURNER that we should just trade the pick for a good player. i dont like Cousins and anybody else in the draft to be a superstar so i think trading the pick would be the best thing to do.

2000 words and not a mention of a breaking and entering in HS, rendering him untouchable except to sleaze like coach Cal. Speaking of Cal, great to assert his historical record of pointguards with a second year guy and a rookie NBA player, what a trackrecord.

JWall is quick & fast (theres a diff) he's a PG that knows when 2 pass & when to take over and score. He's a good defender that anticipates the passing lanes better than any1 I've seen since A.I. taking nothing away from Turner if I'm rebuilding a franchise like the Nets are I go with the charismatic guy with the great smile who will not only produce on the court but will sell jerseys & fill seats @ the new 18,000 seat arena in BROOKLYN!

After reading the above comments I would have 2 agree with U guys (Mike U 4got A.I. tho) I'm actually from Bklyn & have not seen a player of John Wall's potential in at least 15yrs in college.(any player w/his ability went straight outta H.S.)

Sorry... I listed Shaq twice...S/B Howard...

Typo; Forget about drafting a future superstar for now

Don't want to bust anybody's bubble, but in the last twenty years, there have been some very good players drafted #1, some big busts, but only four players I would consider "great".

Shaq
James
Duncan
Shaq.

Not only do you have to get lucky getting the #1 pick but then you have to get really lucky to get a "great" impact player. We should consider ourselves fortunate if we can draft a very good player. Forget about drafting a future for now.

Wall at this point is way overrated. He might fulfill expectations in a few years but he is not close to what most people think he already is.

If you think he is going to help get more wins in season 1, I disagree. He'll shoot terrible and turn it over and give plenty of drama.

If I had the pick I'd give Cousins massive research. He is probably underrated.

Agree with Sam on the Cousins bit...

How about the double teams Lopez will see? Love to get Cousins and the odds of that happening are probably much higher then us getting Wall. I think Wall is great but I like Cousins for our team, even with the so called "baggage" and all.

Hey, muwu here, congrats for becoming a part of NAS

Great comparison to Okafor/Howard. I think we all agree Wall is the No.1 pick for the Nets.

The articles we all SHOULD be writing are ones that ask what we do if we get the 2nd, the 3rd or the 4th pick.

In my mind, the only two potential mega-stars in that group are Wall and Cousins.

Cousins could be a monster in the NBA, and the double teams he would see would take Brook Lopez to the next level.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] that he’s phenomenal, an athletic freak, and quite the dancer.  My NAS colleague, Devin, praises Wall and makes excellent points about Wall’s game.  However, if I were the New Jersey Nets, I’d select Evan Turner if [...]

  2. [...] to win: — The most convincing case for John Wall I’ve [...]

  3. [...] is definitely the number 1 pick, and this blog post here makes an amazing and thorough argument for John Wall being #1, some people still question that. Well, it doesn’t matter, because all indications from the [...]

  4. [...] of reality that they could no longer control their destiny and agonize over the merits of picking John Wall or Evan Turner. Okay, fine, I am saying that. But because of a flawed draft lottery system for [...]

  5. [...] I know that I’ve made my opinion very clear that the no-doubt #1 prospect in this draft is John Wall. I also know that I’ve spent far more time than anyone should deconstructing the debate [...]

  6. [...] John Wall, John Wall, and John Wall. Okay, now that I’ve got that out of my system, let me choose two more – and my other [...]

  7. [...] Williams’s eggs? Have we made the ideal athlete at the power forward position?As I said about John Wall, athleticism is at a premium in the NBA right now. Between slight changes in rule interpretations [...]

Bad Behavior has blocked 4146 access attempts in the last 7 days.

div#middle div.inside #livefyre { display:none !important;}